Sign -Driving Miss Daisy

Sign. Minute Muffler



ENERGY Warm It Up with Sunwing

Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Which of the following do you feel is the most important issue for Thunder Bay voters in this election campaign?

Total Votes: 514
View Results Past Polls
User Submitted Photo Gallery
Submit Your Own Photos
Hyer On The Hill - MP Bruce Hyer is the Member of Parliament for the Thunder Bay-Superior North riding.
2012-04-23 at 15:59

Why I chose Independence

I was honoured when the voters of Thunder Bay-Superior North chose me to be their voice in the House of Commons.

I committed to them:

  • To be honest,
  • To be open
  • To be accessible
  • To keep my campaign promises

Despite wide life experience with dozens of organizations... none was as dysfunctional as Parliament.

I have much respect for most Members in the House of Commons. But our three main parties require lockstep discipline, with little room for meaningful public debate... or for putting constituents ahead of party politics.

Fuelled by a flawed and antiquated electoral system where 39 per cent of the vote can gain 100 per cent of the power, the main parties are mired in a win-lose battlefield mentality.

Instead of Cooperation and compromise, our voters see mindless solidarity, where political parties are always right and they are always wrong.

So I have decided to sit as an Independent Member of Parliament. I did not make this decision quickly or easily. Ever since the October, 2012 election, whenever I meet a Thunder Bay-Superior North constituent for the first time, I often say something like “You are my employer, and I work for you!”

And I mean it.

When John A. MacDonald became Canada’s first prime minister, one of his biggest challenges was getting agreement from his caucus.

In those days, and for a century thereafter, candidates were selected by their riding associations. Period. Their name was on the ballot, without the name of the party.

Voters actually had to know who they were, what party the belonged to, and what they stood for. They worked for the people who nominated them, and the people who elected them. And the leader of their party worked for them.

In the 1960s, the ballots were changed to include the party name alongside the candidate’s.

The bureaucrats were concerned that some interloper might claim to represent a party, so they changed the rules so that the national party leader had to sign and approve the nomination of all candidates running for their party. It could have been just as easy (and in my mind better) to have the riding president do that, but in one fell swoop the national leaders had a sword of Damocles to hold over every MP. And they use it. Pierre Trudeau described his own backbenchers as mere “trained seals.”

Now leaders rule with iron fists. We are told daily what to say, when to say it, and how to vote. Mr. Mulcair has now made it clear he will bring back the long gun registry, and will use the whip.

This flies in the face of both current NDP policy and my commitment to constituents. Another example is how parties are hopelessly locked to polar positions on climate change, making compromise to achieve even piecemeal progress impossible. And parties rarely, if ever, co-operate, with Mr. Mulcair already indicating he is unwilling to co-operate with other parties.   

This does not serve voters well.

Most MPs work hard, and sincerely want to do the best for their country and citizens. There are two things that keep them in line: party discipline, and nice perks. Travel around the world. Infinite supplies of wine and Camembert. Good paychecks. Pensions that are whole lot better than the average Canadian’s.

After over three years of trying to work within this flawed system, I have some ideas on how to make Parliament work better:

• Instead of sitting us in hockey benches waiting for the coach to send us over the boards, randomize us so that we are more likely treat the fellow MP sitting next to us from a different party with respect.
• Have the Riding President sign our nomination papers, rather than the Leader. Or better still; go back to having just the candidate names on the ballot.
• After each election, have the elected MPs from each party select (or re-confirm) their Leader, as in Great Britain. The party President would be elected by all party members, and the caucus Leader selected by the caucus.
• Reform our electoral system, so that when a party gets 39 per cent of the vote, they 39 per cent of the seats (as in most of the world’s democracies), and will learn how to cooperate and compromise. I am committed to working to reform our outdated and undemocratic electoral system.

I know that my decision to be an Independent voice will disappoint or even anger some voters who believe that a person elected as an NDP candidate should stick with the party, no matter what. I will also acknowledge that the procedures in the House are heavily weighted in favour of the parties, and especially the first two parties. 

Nevertheless, I believe I can better represent my constituents with an independent voice.

For now, I will focus on doing what I have worked hard to do for over three years: Help the people being mistreated by CRA or EI. Work with all parties or MPs when possible to make parliament work. Speak up inside and outside the House for issues important for our region, and Canada.


We've improved our comment system.
Varga says:
Way to go Bruce! While I am not one to step away from associations such as this, I too have dropped my allegiances with The NDP party. I was asked in a poll last year who I thought was the better leader among the party leaders and my answer made the woman on the phone choke... not a single one!! Your ideas of political reform are so overdue it isn't even funny and your justification for your decision couldn't be closer to what REAL politics should be about! I will vote for you again even if you run as an independent and coming from em that means a lot!
4/24/2012 11:21:04 AM
gusto says:
Way to go Bruce! You've managed to burn all your bridges at once. Thunder Bay gets shafted again.
4/24/2012 5:28:30 PM
Dontlistentome says:
With some respect Bruce,
How did you not see all these things you mention beforehand? I would suggest that you aren't being totally honest now as to the real reasons you've made this unscrupulous political move. At many times, you were a source of the same dysfunction you accuse others. I think many- even most - constituents voted party and not person. Not to be offensive, but in your case specifically, I think this is most true. Personally, I'm glad there's seemingly one less orange sympathizer in our region.

Vote Harper!
4/24/2012 9:04:41 PM
bob hitchman says:
As most know in our riding Hyer is the worst MP since 1932. I have sent in comments comparing his record to each one of our MP's since Douglas Fisher beat C.D. Howe in 1957. He simply does not measure up. Not even close. He should resign his seat and let a Real Member represent us.
4/25/2012 4:55:17 AM
michaelnigharvey says:
Please resign so we can have a bi election and allow our vote to count!!!
4/26/2012 10:35:08 AM
caesarsquitti says:
I don't see my response here so I will resubmit a shorter version.

Congratulations to Mr. Hyer for standing for some level of integrity.

We do not elect a party, nor a party leader, and he ran on the issues.

We have to change this political system that as we can see in a 'majority government', a minority, the party leader takes total control of the government; a friendly dictator one writer called one before this Prime Minister.
7/11/2012 11:17:36 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In