tbnewswatch.com
Hockey Pick 'Em
Wesway
Eco-Superior
Pick'em Hockey Pool
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
With reports the OAS age limit will be raised from 65 to 67, are you considering increasing your investment in retirement funds?



Total Votes: 20
View Results Past Polls
Survey
Surveys are not available.
2010-08-31 at 13:46

Time's up

By Leith Dunick tbnewswatch.com
Need Xtra Cash? Visit Xtra Cash!For payday advances and cheque cashing, there's no better option than XTRA CASH! Best rates, no holds, and instant Cash! Two convenient locations on Dawson, and on Frederica.Click here for full list of services.

The time for talking is over, says Nishnawbe Aski Nation Grand Chief Stan Beardy.

Fed up with the province’s decision to go ahead with its controversial Far North Act, Beardy said they will stage peaceful protests between now and Sept. 16, when Bill 191 gets its third reading in the Ontario legislature.

"This is a starting point," Beardy said. "We have a responsibility to protect what is rightfully ours. We have the right to govern ourselves. We have a right to determine what happens on our homelands. We need to get our message out there and we need to do whatever it takes to protect our interests."

Beardy reserved the right to up the ante should the provincial Liberals pass the bill as it’s currently written. On Aug. 13 Sandy Lake First Nation Chief Adam Fiddler suggested protest could eventually lead to blockades and other protests, and Beardy refused to rule them out if their current tactics fail.

"That’s what we could be looking at. I think direct action for us is a last resort, but if that’s what it takes, that’s what we’ll have to do," Beardy said.

He reminded the politicians at Queen’s Park that 2011 is an election year, subtly hinting that if changes aren’t made to the Far North Act that gives his people final say on development of their lands their final protest could come at the ballot box.

Beardy added that Bill 191 takes away what he feels are inherent Aboriginal rights, agreed to more than a century ago.

"I think it’s important to remind the government and the voters that we have a treaty relationship. That treaty relationship, that peaceful co-existence and co-operation must be foremost and must be respected," he said.

For the next couple of weeks, Beardy expects he and his chiefs to find themselves extremely busy.

"We’re organizing petitions at the community level, we’re organizing meetings with industry and a variety of social and church groups as well as the MPPs and the political parties to make sure our position is known," Beardy said.

Among their other planned activities against the Far North Act are the distribution of pamphlets and posters, a Queen’s Park rally and a letter-writing campaign to stakeholders and news organizations.

The Far North Act would protect about 225,000 square kilometers of the Northern Ontario boreal forest, half of which is on traditional Aboriginal territory.

Beardy said NAN First Nations have not been adequately consulted and accommodated at the bill has progressed through the legislature and that informed consent of his people is required for it to go ahead.

He’s also upset that the province scheduled, then cancelled a series of five consultations scheduled for earlier this summer and that not a single member of the standing committee has visited any of the affected communities.

Beardy said if the bill passes NAN First Nations will be split along a north-south border and land-use planning will land squarely in the lap of the Ontario government, both of which he has significant issues with.

He cautioned the province to think twice before making a decision deemed unfriendly toward Aboriginal communities.

"I think it’s very important that the Ontario public understands our position, because if there’s no certainty, it’s going to be very hard to create economic activities in the Far North. Right now the Ontario government looks at the Far North a precious metals, energy development, a source of fresh water and prosperity in the future," Beardy said. "What we’re saying is without our participation, it’s going to be very hard to do business in the Far North."

Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(4)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
tudor says:
okay, without getting into the debate about who is right or wrong, I have but two questions

1. Can Mr. Beardy outline exactly what he wants to happen--- not we need to respect treaties, that is given, but what he wants the legislation to say


2. he states that the government cancelled all five meetings. Has TBT followed that up with the gov't. Did the gov't in fact cancel those meetings or did Mr. Beardy. Seems a pretty simple question. If it was the gov't, they should be criticized. If it wasn't the gov't?


I would love to know those answers to two pretty simple questions.
8/31/2010 1:53:04 PM
chbaker says:
Good for Mr Beardy. I think he is standing up for his nation quite well and being a strong leader.

Maybe that guy has studied history and seen how Crown Colonies have raped and pillaged other nations indigenous cultures, and decided he didn't want his nation going the way of Africa while he was in charge.

It's really a cheap shot how the corporate government system is trying to rob the First Nations people AGAIN.
8/31/2010 3:53:01 PM
northervoice says:
I support Chief and N.A.N. First nations and the resource industry has worked quite well in other parts of the country where consultation and working with bands has provided an economic base for many communities.It's their resources,don't deny people a chance to progress and become self sustaining like so many others.One ony has to look at the agreements with DeBeers and the other diamond mines in the Northwest Territories and here in Northern Ontario.Thet have also taken the lead in their own future in Britsh Columbia and mnay other communities.Leave the North alone to decide it's future not people who have never been there or lived there.Or maybe we should tell the south how to live their lives.
9/1/2010 8:30:38 AM
tudor says:
just a quick follow-up to my initial posting.

I don't expect the Chief to outline what he specifically wants because then they would be committed to a position and that is the last thing they want. If you keep it vague, you can shoot for the moon privately without incurring the wrath of the general public.

I would hope the next time, the Source could ask those kinds of questions. If the Chief refuses to answer, or gives a vague answer, print it. Let us see what the position is.

I respect his efforts to represent his people and I do not believe that how they have been treated over the years has been fair.

But I also believe we can't rectify wrongs that were done 100, 200 years ago. We can however makes things better for their people. That should be in everyone's best interests.

I suppose my third question is,

Does the native community want to be part of Canada while retaining their unique culture, to be Canadians as we all are, or do they want to be equal partners, a nation unto themselves to determine how they live, work, and govern.

If the former, lets do whatever it takes to get that accomplished, if it is the latter, it is long past time to have a reasoned discussion about what that means exactly.
9/1/2010 9:00:14 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2012 Dougall Media.