Emerald Ash Borer Task Force
Wesway
Brand New You
United Way
Okay Tire & Auto Service
Aboriginal Initiatives
Coconut Bay
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
Polls are not available.
Polls are not available.
View Results Past Polls

Market Research

Do you own your own home?
Who's Modo
User Submitted Photo Gallery
Submit Your Own Photos
2012-06-29 at 16:14

Fighting floods: Historical Park arming itself with dike

By Leith Dunick, tbnewswatch.com
Tony and Adams PartiesCocktail Parties, Birthday Parties, Receptions and Showers...click here and book your party at TnA's today!Click Here

A flood-prone Fort William Historical Park is about to build up its defences.

A three-metre-high, two-kilometre dike will be built around the provincial park, starting next spring in hopes of warding off the surging waters of the Kaministiquia River.

Over the past decade the facility has faced several flood and near-flood situations, says Robin Gould, a project manager for ANC-Lavalin O&M, who are co-ordinating engineering firm KGS’s efforts to conduct an environmental assessment and project engineering to come up with an efficient, yet effective solution to the ongoing problem.

A public open house was held earlier this week, says project manager Robin Gould, who FWHP deferred comment to on the matter.

Several alternatives, including moving the Fort to other nearby property or raising it above flood-water levels, were tossed around, but in the end a reinforced earthen dike system made the most sense,” Gould said.

A sheet pile wall will also be incorporated into the design along the water’s edge, to protect the grounds, but still maintain access to the river, where several major Fort events are centred.

“The earthen dike portion will blend in very well with the natural aesthetics of the Fort itself. The earthen dike will probably be a three-metre-high swale in the landscaping. That’s a natural topography for the area, so when it’s done and the earthen dike is there and revegetated, when you’re paddling down the river and you approach the Fort facility, you won’t notice it,” Gould said.

The sheet-pile wall will have a like-minded treatment, she added.

“What we’re looking at, at the palisade section, is a vertical steel wall which would be basically hidden behind the palisade,” she said.

“We’ll put the sheet-pile wall in and then put some planking on each side. To the visitor it would have no visual impact and that’s a major concern of the fort, so we don’t upset the historical presence on the site.”

Gould isn’t sure how much the project will cost, saying it’s too preliminary in the process to determine that just yet. But she did say the dike system involved moving about half the amount of material as the other two solutions considered.

The earthen dike system also comes with a proposal to cut a channel into the river bend adjacent to the Fort, to allow ice to flow more smoothly through the water and not get trapped, a major cause of recent flooding.

In 2007, the province spent $2.3 million to repair damage from a 2006 flood, about 20 per cent of its overall facilities rehabilitation budget.

Major floods also occurred in 1977, 2003 and 2008. Minor flooding also occurred earlier this year.

According to government figures, FWHP attracts 90,000 people each year to the Thunder Bay area and generates an annual economic impact of more than $8 million.

 

Click here to submit a letter to the editor.
iCar

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(13)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
unknowncronic says:
should buy out eastend & immediate area to reclaim the REAL OLD FORT & SURROUNDINGS feel if yer gonna spend a dime...

why play on "replica soil" when everything else is so real there??

6/29/2012 5:34:22 PM
today says:
I wonder what the consultants report read back then, about building in a river bed flood plain (or did they not use one). Did it read that there have not been any floods in the past 100 years and that it is a suitable location to build? Are the floods that have occured since building there, a global warming thing? Did all the other experts not know where they were building? Curiously, I wonder who owned that property beforehand as well. Could no one in govt not forsee a possible flood? I guess my real question is, should I believe that the purpose of hiring a consultant firm,is that they are qualified experts giving out unbiased factual information, or are they just giving a molded report to just give a means to get to the predetermined end result? Ask a grade 6 student to explain what a flood plain is, and if the river floods every few years, what the odds of flooding again would be. I'm certain, had the public sector built the Fort, I'm sure it would not of been there.
6/29/2012 7:01:28 PM
tsb says:
The fort is there because Point de Meuron, the name of that peninsula, was a staging ground for the Wolseley Expedition, so it has a historic connection. At the same time, anyone who knows the basics of geography would no that that part of the river is flood prone and not build there.

Although, correct me if I am wrong, the moratorium against building new houses in flood prone areas near the Kam River in Neebing Ward recently ended?
6/30/2012 1:49:55 PM
tsb says:
MONORAIL, etc.
6/29/2012 8:37:58 PM
tree says:
Smart move Old Fort!! A big dyke will definitely fix the problem...
6/30/2012 12:13:52 PM
tree says:
Thee should be more dykes being erected in the city!
6/30/2012 12:15:32 PM
barry medawin says:
Indeed! I too would like to see more dykes in the city.
6/30/2012 3:41:52 PM
wayne says:
From TBNewswatch (July 7th, 2009):

"An $8 million dirt wall will be built around the Fort William Historical Park in an effort to safeguard it from flooding."

"The project is expected to take three years to complete."
-----------

That means the project should have been completed by now. And why hire a consultant to repeat what has already been agreed to and paid by tax-payers three years ago?

"Gould isn’t sure how much the project will cost, saying it’s too preliminary in the process to determine that just yet."

It was costed out at $8 million back in 2009!
6/30/2012 7:37:07 PM
wayne says:
so the flood of 1977 is the fault of 'global warming' How about all the floods that the City had five or more years before that? Watkins, build a time machine and and see how many people you can 'flux' off over 40 years ago.
6/30/2012 9:33:53 PM
Tom Sanderson says:
My,my! Someone for got to lock the gate again.
7/3/2012 11:00:45 AM
Joey Joe Joe Jr. Shabadoo says:
fighting dikes?...

If they can do it there spending 8+ million on dirt,
THEY SURE AS HECK CAN BRING BACK RIVERVIEW RACEWAYS TOO!!

7/3/2012 12:10:31 PM
tree says:
Riverview, lol.... now that's a waste, yay loud cars racing around a track, pointless
7/5/2012 11:48:20 AM
stopthehandouts says:
A dyke needs to be built around the Sewage Treatment Plant
7/3/2012 2:33:13 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2013 Dougall Media.