Wayne Toyota
Aboriginal Initiatives
Marlin Travel
Kowal Insurance Brokers
United Way
Lakehead University
Bill Martins
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
Did your home or the area you live in experience any kind of flooding over the long weekend?


Total Votes: 185
View Results Past Polls

Market Research

Do you own your own home?
Who's Modo
User Submitted Photo Gallery
Submit Your Own Photos
2012-09-11 at 15:52

Passing grade: Infrastructure survey concludes city has 'fair’ roads

By Jeff Labine, tbnewswatch.com
Put a little SPRING in your Step!Take off the boots and take comfort in colour! Running shoes, pumps, sandals. Foot Fashion that feels good! Take Another Look at Stride!click here

A national survey on infrastructures has given Thunder Bay and other municipalities a passing grade.

The Canadian Infrastructure Report Card assessed municipalities across the country in four categories: drinking water, wastewater, storm water and municipal roads. The results varied for each category. Storm water systems ranked ‘very good’ while drinking water and waste water systems received a grade of ‘good’. Roads came in last with only ‘fair’.

The data wasn’t broken down by region or by city and instead looked at infrastructure on a national scale. A total of 346 municipalities registered for the survey but only 123 provided usable data.

At-Large Coun. Larry Hebert said the report card gives an accurate picture of the infrastructure needs in Thunder Bay.

“Generally, I think we’re in pretty good shape,” Hebert said. “We need some work on roads, we know the piping under the roads is quiet old but we have a plan that we’ve been working away at.”

Since 2004, the city has worked to try to eliminate some of its infrastructure deficit. Hebert said they hoped to have 60 per cent of the infrastructure deficit reduced by 2014.

Most of the expenses have been covered by the city. Hebert said they would be asking for help from the federal government on future infrastructure projects in 2014.

“The city has put in as much as $9 million into infrastructure and that’s something we got to do,” he said. “We do have a deficit, which stands at $17 million last time we looked at it. Once we get rid of it then we have to make sure other councils start to ensure that we keep up to date with it so we don’t get a deficit again.”

He said the city has been working on getting a new water and sewage treatment plant.
With a potential mining boom coming, Hebert added it’s critical that they have the roads in good condition as soon as possible.

Operations and infrastructure manager Darrell Matson said like many municipalities, Thunder Bay’s infrastructure is aging, which means the city needs a plan of attack.

Since 2004, the city has strategized to fix the aging infrastructure and has developed several programs such as the Enhanced Infrastructure Renewal Program. The EIRP was implemented this year and has helped the city bridge financial gaps, he said.

“What the national report card has done for the city is that it has confirmed the need for asset management plans in community and the appropriate funding to go along with it,” Matson said.

“It has also put into perspective what municipal administrators have been saying for a number of years. There are huge financial gaps that need to be addressed. The way to address them is through thorough comprehensive assessment strategies for each municipality that is site specifics.”

Overall, the city has a good management plan that will grow over the next few years, he said.

Although the city is doing well, Matson said they will be going over data because of the May flooding disaster. The city will have to wait for the individual engineer firms to complete those reports, which be presented to city council when complete.


 

Click here to submit a letter to the editor.
iCar

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(6)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
chezhank says:
Spending on roadways has increased approximately 100% since 2004, in large part due to additional Federal and Provincial funding support (i.e. Dedicated Gas Tax funding)....no thanks to city council!
9/11/2012 5:32:51 PM
panzerIV says:
You do know they added a 1.5% tax increase (also known as the EIRP) this year in which a majority is directed at roads right.
9/11/2012 7:22:22 PM
chezhank says:
Which should have been rejected by "clowncil" knowing that money was coming from the federal and provincial governments.
9/11/2012 9:26:16 PM
brooky says:
Good on council to take advantage of this!!
9/11/2012 9:11:26 PM
dynamiter says:
WHAT A CROCK!!!!! - """" A total of 346 municipalities registered for the survey but only 123 provided usable data."""""

So I guess this means that city officials filled out a survey and they rated themselves. But at least they did a good enough job for the survey to be evaluated where 223 municipalities ( over 50% ) didnt do a good enough job answering the survey for the information to be collated. Which begs the question was the survey crap, was it presented poorly, was there not enough time given - sounds like my first comment - WHAT A CROCK

9/11/2012 6:38:02 PM
CM Punk says:
For me as a taxpayer and resident of this great city of ours. (sarcasm posted here)

I do not mind if money is spent on roads, sewers, etc. That is the job of the city.

But we are so screwed up because previous councils did not spend anything on roads, its now coming all at once.

Its like not doing any home renos and then all of the sudden you are forced to get a new furnace, new windows, new roof, etc.

John Cena will not beat me on Sunday by the way.
The Best in the world
9/11/2012 11:16:28 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2013 Dougall Media.