TBayTel Green Tec Recycling Event 2013
T. Bay District Health Unit
Twice As Nice Thrift Store
Allstate Insurance
Okay Tire & Auto Service
Patti Derkson RBC
DeBruin's Greenhouses
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
Did your home or the area you live in experience any kind of flooding over the long weekend?


Total Votes: 134
View Results Past Polls

Market Research

Do you own your own home?
Who's Modo
User Submitted Photo Gallery
Submit Your Own Photos
2012-09-18 at 10:56

Dangerous chemicals contained, says airport president

By Leith Dunick, tbnewswatch.com
Need a repair in a hurry?MINUTE MUFFLER has 8 service bays and specialize in Heavy Duty and Performance exhaust systems. Not just mufflers. Call 345-3441Click here for details.

The president and CEO of Thunder Bay International Airports Authority says dangerous chemical once used as a fire retardant has been contained on airport property.

Scott McFadden said perfluorooctane sulfonate hasn’t been used since the TBIAA took over management of the facility in 1997. However, the chemical, also known as PFOS, was once used by firefighters training at a since closed site on the northwest corner of the airport property.

According to the Hamilton Spectator, the toxic chemical was used at more than 30 airports and military sites across Canada and high levels have been found in animals and fish downstream of the southern Ontario city’s airport.

The chemical was banned in Canada in 2008.

“We do have an area on the field, at the site of the old firefighter training area, where this substance has been identified. It has since been contained and is being monitored. Ultimately Transport Canada will have to decide how they’re going to remediate this situation,” McFadden said.

In Hamilton, clean-up costs are estimated in the $3-million range, with the federal government repeatedly refusing to cover the cost.

McFadden isn’t sure what the cost will be to remediate the Thunder Bay site, but he plans to ask Transport Canada to cover any costs.

It came as a bit of a surprise, he said.

“It’s only really recently been identified as an undesirable and there are no provincial or federal regulations or guidelines for what levels of contamination would be considered acceptable,” McFadden said.

“I think the key thing is the area is contained. And we’re continuing to monitor it to ensure it doesn’t become uncontained,” he said, adding the remediation at the old Neebing landfill site was to cap it with a clay cap to prevent percolation.

“I don’t know what the ultimate solution will be yet, but right now it’s not a threat.” 

McFadden said the chemical hasn’t been used at the current firefighting training site located elsewhere on airport lands, noting a membrane has also been installed to ensure any chemicals that are used are unable to leech into surrounding soil or water tables.

As a precaution, airport officials have also gone through inventory of remaining firefighting foam to ensure none contain PFOS.


 

Click here to submit a letter to the editor.
iCar

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(5)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
panzerIV says:
Funny how the federal government is willing to take huge sums of cash from airports and tax the hell out of airlines but when they need help its 'your on your own remember, your not part of us anymore'.
9/18/2012 11:52:32 AM
jimmyboy says:
One has got to love his phrase of "is being monitored"...as well "McFadden isn’t sure what the cost will be to remediate the Thunder Bay site"...and that would be because all we are going to do is monitor it vs. actually obtaining bids to clean it up.!
9/18/2012 12:12:54 PM
Arch Stanton says:
I would be curious to know whether they ever acted on or cleaned up all those leaking old diesel tanks that heated the old hangars. The ground was saturated with diesel around some of them. I suspect not.
9/18/2012 3:00:12 PM
Arch Stanton says:
I would be curious to know whether they ever acted on or cleaned up all those leaking old diesel tanks that heated the old hangars. The ground was saturated with diesel around some of them. I suspect not.
9/18/2012 3:03:21 PM
itshell says:
Anymore experts like to chime in and give their 2 cents...you guys really make me laugh
9/19/2012 6:42:33 AM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2013 Dougall Media.