Emerald Ash Borer Task Force
North Country Cycle and Sports
Kowal Insurance Brokers
Framing & Art Center
Marlin Travel
Performance Kia
Bragg Custom Cabinetry
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
Do you support plan to turn a portion of Bay Street into an active living corridor?


Total Votes: 139
View Results Past Polls

Market Research

Do you own your own home?
Who's Modo
User Submitted Photo Gallery
Submit Your Own Photos
2013-03-07 at 16:46

Lawsuit dropped

By Jeff Labine, tbnewswatch.com
Tony and Adams PartiesCocktail Parties, Birthday Parties, Receptions and Showers...click here and book your party at TnA's today!Click Here

The Toronto law firm that filed a multi-million dollar class action lawsuit against the city has withdrawn its case.

Adair Morse LLP filed the $510 million lawsuit against the city on Oct. 29 2012. That lawsuit was the second filed against the city in the aftermath of the May flooding at the Atlantic Avenue Secondary Sewage Treatment Plant last year.

The Watkins law firm filed a claim of $320 million in June.

Both lawsuits accused the city of negligence, however none of the accusations have been proven.

Although two lawsuits were filed, a judge would have had to rule if either of the class action suits could proceed and even then, only one could move forward. But the lawsuit from the Toronto-based law firm was dropped last month leaving the door open for the Watkins law firm to take the suit.

Lawyer Jerome Morse said his law firm went through a reshuffling of resources and couldn’t meet the demands of the case. He explained that the residents who were part of his  firm’s class action suit will still be involved in the existing suit.

“No one ‘signs on’ for a class-action case other than a proposed representative plaintiff who remains a member of the class if not the representative plaintiff,” he said in an email to tbnewswatch.com.

“All persons who fit the description of the class, whatever law firm they ‘identified with’, will be members of the class if certified unless they choose to opt out of the certified class.”

Lawyer Alexander (Sandy) Zaitzeff said he was pleased when he heard on Feb. 19 that the other law firm “folded their tent” but wasn’t sure what the reason was.

With the city now facing one class action lawsuit as a result of the flooding disaster, Zaitzeff said it has advanced their legal action by about six months.

“Within the next five days we will be revising the statement of claim for the third time,” he said.

“We will submit it to the city’s lawyers after which I’m confident we will get certified within 90 days.

“We’ve now toured the plant. We’re now able at this point to pinpoint what we feel were the causes of the flood. Let’s just say there’s no question that there was negligence involved.”

There’s nothing stopping another law firm from filing another flood-related class action lawsuit against the city.

Zaitzeff said his firm has done a lot of work on the lawsuit already and would fight to keep their case going.

He added that the new statement will involve the same category of people involved in the last document and will seek similar damages. He plans to refine the class action and the areas of the city that were affected by the flood.

They’re trying to narrow where the damages are and putting more focus on the plant instead of the entire city.

If successful in court, Zaitzeff and his firm will receive 33.3 per cent of the settlement. Zaitzeff publicly said they will give five per cent of that to whatever charity is helping the most needy flood victims at the time.

Mayor Keith Hobbs said having the Toronto law firm drop its suit was a positive development for the city.

“I always maintained that we did everything in our power to deal with a natural disaster like putting in the safe homes program,” he said.

“We did our due diligence and believe this is a sign of good things to come. I don't think there is much merit to the lawsuit.”

 



 


Click here to submit a letter to the editor.
iCar

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(14)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
vimeo says:
Who is going to win here? Certainly not me as a taxpayer if they win. $320 million divided by 50 or so thousand taxpayers....you'll bankrupt the city Sandy...and you'll walk away with a cool $100 million. Nice work. Pardon me, you'll give a few petty million to charity. That makes me feel better.

It rained. A lot. Equipment broke. Were there lawsuits after the hurricanes in New Orleans when the levies broke? No. They all did the best they could during a natural disaster.
3/7/2013 5:48:00 PM
passlake says:
hate to burst your bubble, but there most definitely were lawsuits surrounding Hurricane Katrina.

In fact, up until this past September when the court of appeals overturned the case, the US Army Corps of Engineers were held liable for much of the damage.

As well, the manufacturer of the temporary housing trailers was successfully sued for $46.2 million because of poor air quality in the traillers.

Now. I am NOT saying I believe there should be a lawsuit. I read some of the report that came out a few months back and I don't feel the city was negligible and created conditions to cause the flooding issues.. but you need to get facts straight. Considering you're already on the internet, it's pretty easy.
3/8/2013 9:43:18 AM
vimeo says:
Ok, I'll give you that. Fair enough. Yes, I do admit defeat when I'm wrong unlike a few here who keep beating a dead horse.

Perhaps I should have used a more local example like Manitoba who frequently gets flooded. Each flood is different. They keep preparing yet homes get flooded. We can try and predict Mother Nature and prepare for disasters, but you'll never be 100% prepared...that's not the city's fault.
3/8/2013 2:19:33 PM
passlake says:
I agree. the city can only reasonably plan for so much until it becomes cost prohibitive. key word "reasonable"... and I think our city did that.
3/8/2013 5:35:37 PM
hymers says:
No, this lawsuit will not bankrupt the city... Thunder bay has insurance for this kind of stuff.
3/8/2013 2:12:29 PM
razor_burn says:
I saw that coming. Can't blame the city for something Mother Nature does.
3/7/2013 7:22:21 PM
hoey says:
This is utterly ridiculous!! According to these geniuses, Can I sue the city for last years hailstorm for not having an adequate hail defense??
3/8/2013 8:49:22 AM
BorderDave says:
I am launching a lawsuit against the city for NOT having an adequate hail defense last year. Im asking 500,000,000 in damages. Who wants in??
3/8/2013 8:54:53 AM
joey joe joe jr. shabadoo says:
...the city should be sued for stupid projects they are allowing... ie: bent poles
3/8/2013 11:55:10 AM
PurpleLeaves says:
BorderDave, I will join yours if you indulge mine. Class action suit against the city for allowing a class action suit against the city. Logic.
3/8/2013 12:43:10 PM
ozone says:
This is what is wrong in this town.

Frivilious lawsuits that benefits the lawyers wallets and not the victims .
3/8/2013 1:50:09 PM
hoey says:
PurpleLeaves, I will indulge yours because its TRUE!!!!
3/9/2013 2:01:03 PM
mystified says:
This website should be sued for posting the bizarre comments made by some of the users. Some of you sound like you are 12 year olds making a double dare.
It's one less issue council has to worry about. I think it's a good thing.
3/10/2013 1:39:43 PM
BorderDave says:
mystified, how about you stop tying to act tough little man!!
3/12/2013 6:38:27 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2013 Dougall Media.