Tbnewswatch Local News
Saturday July 4 2015
10:42 PM EDT
2014-05-08 at 16:31

Controlling education

Ontario regional chief Stan Beardy says jurisdiction is key in future of First Nation education.
Jodi Lundmark, tbnewswatch.com
Ontario regional chief Stan Beardy says jurisdiction is key in future of First Nation education.
By Jodi Lundmark, tbnewswatch.com

THUNDER BAY -- Jurisdiction is the top issue when it comes to the future of First Nation education, says Ontario's regional chief.

"If you don't have any control over your destiny, if somebody decided that for you, you will never know where you'll end up,” said Stan Beardy Thursday at the Chiefs of Ontario Indigenous Education: Gateway to Freedom Summit at the Victoria Inn.  “You will cease to be who you are."

The two-day summit has First Nation leadership, educators and school boards gathered in the city to examine the First Nation Control of First Nation Education Act, also known as Bill C-33, which has been stalled by the federal government in the wake of Assembly First Nations' national chief Shawn Atleo's resignation last week.

Beardy said they want to hear what problems people have with the bill as well as what they want to see in education legislation.

"The major problem we heard is it does not recognize our inherent right. It does not recognize our jurisdiction," he said.

The last time education legislation was imposed on First Nations was the residential school system and Beardy said people are still suffering from that.

"It was disastrous for everybody," he said. "If this legislation is imposed on us without proper consultation, without our support and approval, it will create problems for us."

What the chiefs are looking for in education legislation is authority to incorporate their concepts - to reflect their culture and values.

With the bill on hold, the First Nations now have to get organized, said Gordon Peters, the grand chief of the Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians.

Peters, who holds the education portfolio for the Chiefs of Ontario, said the challenge is now figuring out exactly what they don't support in the bill and what they want to see instead.

"Across the country, we're different nations of people. We have different histories. But I think we all have something in common - we want something better for our children and that has to include better funding to be able to help support our children," he said.

Ideally, Peters would like to see Prime Minister Stephen Harper withdraw the bill and start negotiating legislation that will help First Nation children and what's going to move it forward is if people get involved.

"We arranged this summit to hear the voice of the people," said Peters, noting the summit is a starting point to find out what Ontario communities want to see in the legislation.

That strategy will then be brought to the national level, he added.

Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

Click here to report a typo or error



We've improved our comment system.
ranma says:
It's kinda funny that now that Alteo is out, everyone appears to be coming up against the act that he helped create. An act that took YEARS to create, and millions of dollars from all these reserves, from their chiefs flying out to said meetings. Now they want to spend more of their reserves money on more negotiations and planning.

It sounds more like all they want is money, and no accountability.
5/9/2014 8:11:07 PM
orca says:
Peters said the challenge now is to figure out what they don't support in the bill and what they want moving forward.

Seems like they are not sure what they want as well. If I was the federal government, I would just give them the money they need (on par with the current canadian budget for education) and let them do what they want with it. After 10 years, review the results and take action depending on the results.
5/9/2014 7:27:54 AM
tsb says:
I wish they were better at articulating their position.

Basically, the two main reasons to oppose the FNCFNE Act are 1: the act forces reserves to set up elaborate school boards, fully staffed, of which half of the trustees are appointed by the federal government, thus removing any real local control of education; and 2: the government has not yet explained where the funding is coming from, and whether or not it will be in addition to current funding, or will replace it. If it's the latter, it will be a decline from the current funding levels, and either way, will continue to see First Nations schools underfunded compared to their provincial counterparts.
5/8/2014 7:20:00 PM
jonthunder says:
Did the AFN not negotiate the current deal on the table? Does it need to be re-negotiated from scratch for some ???? reason?
5/8/2014 7:13:40 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Log In