tbnewswatch.com
Hockey Pick 'Em
Candy Bouquet
Tao's Archery Services
United Way
Confederation College WInter Programs
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
With reports the OAS age limit will be raised from 65 to 67, are you considering increasing your investment in retirement funds?



Total Votes: 21
View Results Past Polls
Survey
Surveys are not available.
2010-02-06 at 15:58

Casting a ballot

By Jeff Labine, tbnewswatch.com
GOLD is at RECORD HIGHS!Want to turn your old gold jewelry into some serious Xtra Cash? Visit XTRA CASH! We have the Best rates in town. Get instant cash at either location: on Dawson and on Frederica.Click here for full list of services.

The federal government recently offered $3.5 million to settle a hundred-year-old Loch Lomond land claim.

Fort William First Nation members voted on whether or not to accept the offer Saturday. Members could vote at the Fort William First Nation Community Centre or mail in their ballot. More than 1,350 members registered to vote, and results are expected sometime Monday.

If the offer is accepted, Fort William First Nation will have to hand over $2.3 million of the settlement money to the City of Thunder Bay for outstanding taxes on the AbitibiBowater sawmill that is situated on the land in question.

John Kimball came to vote with his mother and his sister. He is an adult education instructor for the enabling program on Mission Road and he said the voting day was a great day.

"We get to get over the past and move on," Kimball said.

Kimball said he would like to see some of the money go toward paying off the debt. The rest of the money could go toward the community, including taking care of the elderly, better education and health care and spiritual growth.

The Fort William First Nations submitted its land claim in September 2005. The community’s leadership complained that they hadn’t received adequate compensation for the use of First Nation land at the north end of Loch Lomond.

The First Nations community received compensation in 1925 but that did not include the use of the water.

Between 1910 and 1995, the Town of Fort William made a number of agreements to provide the federal government with right-of-way and restricted First Nation’s use of land near the north end of Loch Lomond.

Crystal Donohue lives in Thunder Bay and came to the community centre to vote. She said it is always important to vote and added that it would be awesome if the band received the settlement money.

"I would like a few things," Donohue said. "Maybe housing…maybe some kind of halfway house for people coming out of prison or trying to prevent people from going to prison."

Peter Collins, chief of Fort William First Nations, said he is disappointed that they will have to pay the tax despite not being a taxable community.

Despite that disappointment, Collins said he still would be surprised if the community rejected the offer.

"I’m hoping that this will get settled today," Collins said. "The money is only going in two directions. There is going to be a cash distribution for our members and 2.3 is going to offset the tax burden."

Collins said the federal government failed to protect the band’s rights in 1905. The government at the time took two land surrenders from the First Nation community, the first of which was for the pipeline right-of-way from Loch Lomond and the second to draw water from Loch Lomond.

Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(6)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
Ian J Bannon says:
Again I want to correct the report which is being submitted to the public. FWFN made a decision to to proceed with the option of using some of the funds to fullfill the agreement to pay the city of Thunder Bay towards the proprty tax. This is the second time that it has been portraid that FWFN "have to pay the city". This is a business decision that people must respect since it goes against our position in the matter.
2/7/2010 10:54:30 AM
Steven says:
Ian, trying to understand your comment..... Do you speak for the FWFN's? Are you a band member?

What do you mean when you say paying the money is a "business decision people must respect"? What is your position in the matter?

From my understanding, the FWFN does "have to pay the city" that money it is owed, and has been delinquent for quite some time.
Please correct me if I am wrong.....like to learn more.
2/7/2010 4:41:49 PM
bildzeitung says:
Steven -- Ian Bannon is the Lands Manager for FWFN.

From what I've read, the tax issue has been in and out of the courts, and if I understand correctly, the settlement closes the matter in that no further taxes can be levied against the property since it reverts to reserve land.

I suspect that the FWFN had to weigh a lot of alternatives before deciding on holding the vote -- as difficult a decision as those made by those voting yesterday.
2/7/2010 10:23:21 PM
NDNKAR says:
I voted in favor of yesterday's land claim settlement. I could have voted either way or even refused to cast a ballot due to voter apathy. My voter apathy extends from both the last couple band council elections and the finger-pointing and witchhunt which occured with our band's welfare fraud issue from the past few years. The fact that I voted yesterday is a suprise. As for the actual land claim vote itself, I've noticed a few opinions amongst my fellow band members. Band members are under the notion that the $2.3 million in taxes owed to the City of Thunder Bay will eventually be reimbursed to the band and disbursed amongst its band members once the issue with the Bowater sawmill is settled. Another point I heard amongst my fellow band members is that there is another, much larger, specific claim yet to be settled. With so many opinions and voices, it was hard to determine which is hearsay and which is not. I hope specifics can be clarified so persons are not misinformed and develop unrealistic expectations regarding monetary compensation. I'd also like to thank Ian for doing his part to clarify the band's position in this matter. Miigwetch!
2/7/2010 11:46:32 PM
Steven says:
Ah!

Well I'm glad that one more land issue is getting cleared up, and that FWFN will (if this all goes through) will have those lands revert to the band.

Congrats FWFN!
2/8/2010 9:35:37 AM
standswithpitchfork says:
I think Mr Bannon's objection is with the choice of words "Have to" which makes it appear as though someone else made them comply.

Which reflects a negative light on the band and community once again.

Rather than the article stating more accurately that FWFN "CHOSE TO" make paying taxes to the city a priority when working out the details of the settlement.

Which is a more positive light, suggesting FWFN is being co-operative in this matter.

Despite the fact that the Band and it's members do not agree with the court ruling, that FWFN is to pay taxes to the city, for property which for all intensive purposes is their own, they "CHOSE" to do so.




2/8/2010 9:51:46 AM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2012 Dougall Media.