tbnewswatch.com
Hockey Pick 'Em
Performance Kia
Wayside Cafe
Tao's Archery Services
News
Click here to see more
Subscribe
Community Calendar
Click here for full listings.
Poll
With reports the OAS age limit will be raised from 65 to 67, are you considering increasing your investment in retirement funds?



Total Votes: 22
View Results Past Polls
Survey
Surveys are not available.
2010-02-08 at 17:40

Getting the message

By Jodi Lundmark, tbnewswatch.com
Need Xtra Cash? Visit Xtra Cash!For payday advances and cheque cashing, there's no better option than XTRA CASH! Best rates, no holds, and instant Cash! Two convenient locations on Dawson, and on Frederica.Click here for full list of services.
Since the distracted driver legislation’s education period ended Feb. 1, Thunder Bay Police Service issued only eight tickets and the OPP handed out seven to motorists using handheld devices while driving.

While it’s not a widespread problem, Thunder Bay Police traffic Sgt. Glenn Porter said there are still people out there that know better; they’re just not complying with the law.
Just Monday morning, Porter said he stopped a man who was talking while stopped at a red light.

"He had the phone up to his ear and I signalled for him to stop and he was still talking on the phone as I was walking up to the truck to talk to him about the offence," he said. "His response was ‘I thought you guys were still giving out caution tickets.’ I think it’s just going to be a question of people getting charged and the word getting around that the police are actually laying the charges before people start paying attention to it."

While checking for drivers using handheld devices is part of the police’s regular patrols, Porter said they found it was convenient to do it while conducting speeding blitzes.

Officers were situated on Arthur Street West Monday morning; Porter said he noticed speeds were getting excessive on the stretch by the Thunder Bay Mall.

"This is a 50-kilometre (per hour) zone and we’re finding speeds in excess of 80 kilometres (per hour) as they’re approaching the lights here," Porter said.

In the past three days, the police had issued 80 tickets for speed violations.

Porter also mentioned as they’ve been looking for people on cell phones, they’ve noticed many vehicles with tinted windows and they’re going to be more vigilant enforcing that law.
"It is the law that you can’t have tinting that obscures the (ability to identify) the driver from both sides," he said, adding the fine for having tinted windows is $110. Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

Click here to report a typo or error

Tbnewswatch.com(11)

Comments

We've improved our comment system.
westfort says:
So now, they're after the window tinters eh? What's next...the colour of our cars? A lot of what you see has to do with the angle or how much light is shining on the window. Is it too tough for the cops to look through the windshield?

That said, I am glad that they are going after these dough-heads who think they can talk/text and drive. Use your speaker phone! They all have it built in unless you have a phone from the 90s! If you don't want to do that, or buy a Bluetooth device, then let the phone ring and get it later. No one is that important that they need to take that call...unless they're a doc on call. Otherwise, use the speaker phone, Bluetooth, or call them back.
2/8/2010 7:56:08 PM
Jaded says:
Forget the cell phones, that's common sense. There's no phone call important enough to risk an accident for. But this distraction law apparently also applies to mp3 players plugged into the car through the lighter, usb port, etc. What I want to know, and I hope someone explains this to me, is why it's dangerous to push a button on a plugged in ipod, and a ticketable (my made up word for the day) offense, but fiddling with the installed car radio is perfectly alright?

I'm not crazy about laws that are left open to interpretation or rely on the discretion of any one particular individual. Police make mistakes, just like everyone else, but in this case, their mistake could end up costing someone a lot of money.
2/9/2010 8:08:08 AM
baor says:
to westfort: you do know that the cops don't actually write the laws they are sworn to enforce don't you. The people that you elected wrote the window tint laws.
2/9/2010 8:43:38 AM
pieislandrefugee says:
"To serve and collect"

All those big salaries got to come from somewhere.
2/9/2010 9:17:49 AM
TheDrivingSchool.ca says:
Good job getting the word out there that this is against the law. I just had a course this weekend and you would not believe how addicted these kids are to their phones! One student actually had to hold his cell phone in his hand like a security blanket!!

Any distractions can and will get you into trouble.
2/9/2010 9:24:38 AM
golden#1 says:
It,s about time the police are out there giving tickets to these clowns who think that there so imporant that they have to talk all day on the phone and not watching where there going THE TINT WINDOW HAS BEEN ON THE BOOKS SINCE I WAS A TEEN SO DON,T START CRYING NOW
2/9/2010 11:39:01 AM
Jaded says:
"Any distractions can and will get you into trouble."

Ah, but this is where the problem of the slippery slope lies. What distracts one person doesn't necessarily distract the next person, so where do we draw the line? Personally, I can get distracted easily, and I'm aware of this, so I ask my children to refrain from asking me a thousand questions while driving because I'm trying to focus on the road. My sister can talk a blue streak and drive wonderfully. Joe Blow may be able to scarf down a big mac on his way back to work and not bat an eye, but many others can't. What about the car radios, that some people can easily be distracted by, or the heating controls, or rolling down a window, etc while driving?

Like I said earlier, I'm all for the cell phone law, but I have a huge issue with laws that leave so much open for interpretation. Who's to say what is and isn't a distraction?
2/9/2010 1:25:23 PM
Steven says:
So when everyone is whining about how there are not enough police and crime is sky high, and the police union is complaining their poor members are overworked, but here they are worrying about this?

Lets get down to the base of it: This is about money.

Sure, its bad to drive and text, drive and shave, or drive and use your easy bake oven. But the cops aren't there to protect you. They are simply using this as one more power to get your money, to pay their giant salaries.

Couldn't we train someone to do speed traps, and give tickets for this sort of thing along with speeding? Couldn't they be similar to a parking ticket person, and earn the lower salary? Why are we paying cops to do this type of thing?
2/9/2010 1:43:19 PM
baor says:
steven steven steven.....cops are not tax collectors nor are they law writers...the people YOU voted for are the above mentioned culprits. No one here complains about the people who actually wrote the law (liberal party of ontario). If you, steven, think that the cops are not there to protect you then maybe you should never call one when your getting mugged, home invaded, bee and eed etc. Who would you bitch about then.
2/9/2010 3:58:30 PM
thunderkol says:
I wonder what would happen if you could no longer drink coffee in your car. Rioting in the streets?
2/10/2010 4:45:56 PM
driver says:
The so-called window tint law is subjective and up to the cop's discretion. How is that a law? if the cop is having a bad day he can give you a fine for your window tint? How is that any sort of law?
2/12/2010 9:54:49 AM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Forgot password?
Log In
 
 
© 2012 Dougall Media.