Current Weather
-12.8°C Sunny 4 km/h
Full Forecast
Tbnewswatch National News
Saturday March 28 2015
1:15 AM EDT
2014-07-11 at 10:25

Supreme Court rules only Ontario has right to permit logging on aboriginal lands

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA - The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the Ontario government's right to permit industrial logging on a First Nation's traditional lands.

Today's 7-0 ruling comes on the heels of a historic judgment in the Tsilhqot'in case in British Columbia that changed the way governments must deal with First Nations over land where aboriginal title is claimed.

The Grassy Narrows First Nation appealed after Ontario's highest court ruled in March 2013 that the province has the right to "take up" treaty land for forestry and mining.

Grassy Narrows argued that only Ottawa has the power to take up the land because the treaty promises were made between the Crown and First Nations.

The Supreme Court disagreed.

The decision says that even though the treaty was negotiated by the federal government, it is an agreement between the Ojibway people and the Crown. Under the Constitution, Ontario has exclusive authority to take up provincial lands for forestry, mining, settlement and other matters.

The court also noted that nothing in the text or history of the treaty suggests there needs to be a two-step process requiring the federal government's approval.

"I agree with the Ontario Court of Appeal that Ontario and only Ontario has the power to take up lands under Treaty 3," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the decision.

The tiny community from northwestern Ontario has spent more than a decade in court fighting the province's decision to issue a licence for clearcut operations in parts of the Keewatin portion of Treaty 3 territory.

The Supreme Court's decision clarifies the roles of the federal and provincial governments when it comes to resource development on treaty land.

Thunder Bay-Superior North MPP Michael Gravelle said the decision by the country’s highest court concludes what has been a “lengthy” process.

Gravelle, the current Minister of Northern Development and Mines, headed the natural resources portfolio when the Ontario Court of Appeals ruled on the case

The decision was highly anticipated by various parties across the country as it had the potential to set a precedent for future natural resource development.

With Ring of Fire development expected in the next decade, Gravelle was paying close attention.

“We were all looking to the Supreme Court to give what would be a fair ruling on it and I think it’s fair to say that’s happened,” he said.

“We view this decision was one that will allow us to move ahead with some certainty and reassurance we can move forward together.”

With files from Matt Vis,

The Canadian Press
© The Canadian Press, 2015


We've improved our comment system.
YellowSnow13 says:
Very Interesting!
"Under the Constitution, Ontario has exclusive authority to take up provincial lands for forestry, mining, settlement and other matters."
Oh boy the Ring of Fire is going to get really interesting now!
7/11/2014 12:21:03 PM
ranma says:
So because of this ruling, will the companies go back to KI lands that they were illegally kicked off of? Will this now allow the Ring of Fire to go forward?
7/11/2014 6:40:16 PM
caesarjbasquitti says:
Yes and no.

Any person, or group who owns a piece of property should have exclusive rights to what grows on the land and what is found below it. It should be their right, conditional upon guidelines that the province, or government might find necessary to maintain the integrity of the land, for the benefit of people. In no case do I see the need for 'clear cutting', nor giving all the timber rights to one person, as was the case in Ontario, that contributed to some of the problems we have had in the timber business in Northern Ontario.
7/11/2014 9:47:29 PM
Comments for this story are semi-moderated. Read our comment guideline.

Add a new comment.
You must log in to add comments.
Create a new account
Log In